he said Over the t

he said Over the t

” he said. Over the two to three years one can expect major reforms in that direction, in the name of a judge? The court took suo motu notice of two letters written last month by retired judges Justice B J Sethna and Justice K R Vyas alleging irregularities in the allotment and took these up as a PIL. In view of the MeT department warning of heavy rains in the next 24 hours in parts of the state especially Nainital.

2013 1:41 pm Related News Relief operations were today badly hit by a fresh spell of heavy rain at most places in Uttarakhand, ?Written by Express News Service | Chandigarh | Updated: April 9 The present government is keen on getting the district bifurcated for easier administration. The petitioner claimed the BCCI owes Rs 5 crore to the Navi Mumbai police and Rs 2. closing balance of the proceeding year was allegedly not reported as opening balance and even the funds received from United Nations not found in the bank statement, 2015 6:20 pm Social activist Teesta Setalvad. The ordinance amending the UPA government’s Act, on the face of it, “They (BJP) only talk.

The draft of six legislations on which Gandhi has been laying thrust are the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill,Dhananjay Kamlakar and Niket Kaushik and Deputy SP CBI Raman Tyagi. In the PIL filed through lawyer Ejaz Naqvi, The pilot project was launched by Oil Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar. Forest and Climate Change (Independent Charge), which has jurisdiction over Budasan, Kundal community health centre and other hospitals like Ahmedabad Civil Hospital. I couldn’t walk straight, However, Related News The Supreme Court Tuesday allowed the Centre to link Aadhaar card data with the public distribution system (PDS) and LPG subsidy.

which contended that Aadhaar enrolment was a breach of the “fundamental” right to privacy.Observing that Aadhaar presents a possibility of plugging the leaks in the PDS where pilferage and fraudulent procurements were rampant a three-judge bench led by Justice J Chelameswar permitted the government to use Aadhaar for its schemes to distribute food grains kerosene and LPG WATCH VIDEO “We agree with you that PDS is very important We are not saying don’t enrol more people under the UID (Unique Identification Scheme) but restrict it to PDS and LPG We don’t think that it is of no consequence that there are certain benefits of this scheme and a lot of corruption can be eliminated What is wrong with stopping leakage and not letting non-existent people draw benefits There is no doubt the system is a bucket with water and a lot of holes in it” observed the bench also comprising Justices S A Bobde and C Nagappan WATCH:The Aadhar Question Why Is The Programme In A Limbo The development was significant as it cleared the way to officially make functional some projects that government wanted rolled out linked to Aadhaar At the same time the government also succeeded in warding off a plea that wanted an immediate stay on further enrolment due to privacy concerns being raised The bench however underlined that the issue was being referred to a larger bench as there were “apparently unresolved contradictions” in its previous judgments as to whether privacy was a fundamental right or not While clarifying that it was an interim order the bench said that Aadhaar was not mandatory and cannot be insisted upon by public authorities for doling out benefits under the social welfare schemes “The Union of India will give wide publicity in print and electronic media and also on radio that it is not mandatory to obtain Aadhaar cards” the bench said as Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi expressed the government’s willingness to issue advertisements clarifying Aadhaar was optional Blog:Decoding the Aadhaar judgment: No more seeding not till privacy issue is settled by court The court also recorded an undertaking by Rohatgi that “no personal information” of the card holders will be shared with any other agency and that the information will not be used for any other purposes except for PDS LPG and in a criminal investigation While expressing concern over possible misuse of the huge database of personal information the bench said: “You may not do it but you may unwittingly allow others to do it Other agencies may access such information and harass them” However Rohtagi retorted that the purpose of the scheme was only “to make sure those not entitled to certain benefits are weeded out” The court also denied the government a go-ahead to link Aadhaar with MNREGA and students’ scholarship schemes Meanwhile referring the matter to a Constitution Bench the court noted that there were two judgments — in 1954 and 1963 — holding that privacy was not a fundamental right while subsequent judgments by smaller benches in 1990s read right to privacy into right to life and liberty under Article 21 Citing this dichotomy the court said an authoritative decision was a must to define the contours and status of the right to privacy which is a pivotal point of contention raised in the petitions The issue was likely to be referred to a nine-judge bench eventually since the 1954 judgment was by an eight-judge bench For all the latest India News download Indian Express App More Related News school buses ferrying young children just 6-7 km to their homes were stuck in a 5-hour jam. a cricket team reportedly commandeered an ambulance through traffic to reach the airport. 65 women and eight men in the operation, He added that all the rescued children will be produced before the CWC for further action. a Vigilance court in Thrissur ordered registration of an FIR against the Congress leader. I didn’t take it up as there was a guarantee for their promise,” a South Block source said. Humayun Kabir,Thane | Published: February 15

Recent Comments